Home
>
Thoughts
>
Article

Differences between Recruitment and Talent Acquisition in Employee Management

Banner-Article-JULY-TAvsRecruit.jpg

Recruitment and talent acquisition are often used interchangeably. Neither one is better than the other so the two things sound like the same activity. Although recruitment and talent acquisition have similar goals, their approaches are very different.

These two things tend to be contradictory. The main difference between recruitment and talent acquisition is short-term and long-term planning. Recruitment is the process of finding and screening qualified candidates for a particular position and offering the position to the best candidate.

In contrast, the context of talent acquisition is broader than one position or a certain time period. The recruitment process tends to be reactive, while talent acquisition is a proactive candidate search activity.

Differences in Recruitment and Talent Acquisition Viewpoints

Through the company's main focus, you can see whether the company carries out recruitment or talent acquisition. You can't plan for every (employee) retirement, promotion, or departure. Recruiting is there for when you need to fill a vacant role quickly. There is a clear short-term goal of filling the job and moving on to the next job.

Talent acquisition is a continuous process of attracting and engaging talent with special skills, experience and perspectives, of course it is more strategic. This process plans for current and future business needs and is flexible enough to adapt as those needs change.

Assessment of the Talent Acquisition Process is Better Than Recruitment

Recruitment is not wise for long-term planning because it focuses on immediate needs in the short term. Within a day, recruiters can achieve the expected targets with several types of existing job vacancies.

However, too many job vacancies without a clear plan for filling them can be bad for the company. Some of the consequences that can result from this are employee fatigue, lower productivity, and loss of profits or income.

Talent acquisition benefits from prior strategic planning. If your company has plans to acquire another company, launch a new product, or open a new location, then you will need more people with specific skills and experience, perhaps in engineering, brand reputation, or cybersecurity.

A narrow hiring scope means you start from scratch for every new role. Success or failure is clear and linear. With talent acquisition, there are more and faster paths to success. The best employees that will be obtained next can be sourced from outside, from the existing talent network, or filled by internal candidates.

Which Should Be the Main Focus of Your Business?

Both recruitment and talent acquisition have the right time and place. If these two processes are considered equal, talent acquisition can be said to be superior to recruitment because it approaches people as a strategic investment.

This does not mean looking down on the recruitment process, sometimes the right step or the only step that can be taken is to accept someone into an existing job vacancy as quickly as possible. Not all companies have time to plan that far ahead.

Therefore, talent acquisition takes into account how to attract, engage, recruit and advance people at every level that will help your business to grow. This process is also better at adapting to the unexpected.

Talent Acquisition as a Foundation for Building a Superior Team

Without talent acquisition, companies will have difficulty increasing their workforce according to needs. If this happens, the company will be much more vulnerable to fluctuations in the labor market.

Talent acquisition is acceptable because attracting and hiring passionate and qualified employees is a continuous process. This only works when you attract, engage, recruit and develop the right potential people for your team.

In the human resources (HR) development process, it is best to carry out the recruitment and talent acquisition processes simultaneously. However, it is not wrong if a business or company adapts one of them. The most important thing is to identify the most effective approach method for your company's needs and culture.

RELATED ARTICLE